 |
| The Ada County Democratic Caucus in Boise, Idaho |
Dear Well-Meaning Bernie Sanders Supporter:
I am not writing this letter to change your mind. I am
writing this letter to help you understand why you won’t change mine.
In 1992, I voted in my first presidential election. Much to
my Democratic parents’ chagrin, I’d grown up loving Ronald Reagan, but in
college, I was disillusioned with Operation Desert Storm and unimpressed with
George H.W. Bush’s lackluster economic policies. Like many people my age, I found
myself intrigued by the sax-playing, wise-cracking young governor from Arkansas,
with his “outsider” ethos and rags-to-riches American Dream narrative.
But what impressed me most about Bill Clinton was his wife.
From the start, it was clear that they were partners who
considered each other equals. Hillary Clinton was smart, capable, and she didn’t
stay home and bake cookies all day. She was the kind of woman I wanted to be
when I grew up. I remember asking a friend, “Why can’t we have her for
president?”
And my friend said, “Be patient. We probably will someday.”
In 2008, Clinton had proved her worth, working long hours as
a senator, with a voting record nearly as progressive as Bernie Sanders.
Then another charming young man with a compelling rags to
riches story came along, promising hope and change. Hillary Clinton got a
consolation prize: Secretary of State. Watching President Obama finally reach
his stride in the last days of his presidency, I wonder how things might have
been different if their positions were reversed—if she had won the presidency
in 2008, made him her Vice President, and he had learned the leadership skills
he seems to be finally acquiring.
(Note: Obama’s presidency has been mostly a disappointment
to me).
Instead, now we’re watching Hillary Clinton, the most
qualified, intelligent, articulate, compassionate, pragmatic presidential
candidate, get taken down again, this time by loud white men.
Ouch.
In 2008, I was willing to concede that hope and change were
compelling. But now, in 2016, I can come to only one conclusion about why
Hillary Clinton is still struggling to connect with many American voters: It’s
because she is a woman.
It’s sure not because of her impressive resume:
- She has the most foreign policy experience of any candidate.
- She is respected by leaders around the globe and is the most admired woman in the world.
- She is progressive but pragmatic.
- She knows how to listen and to compromise.
- She basically invented universal healthcare in the United States.
- She works harder than anyone else in the room.
I don’t think it’s because of her policy proposals either. I
like Hillary’s specific, detailed plans to address a number of issues that
concern me:
- Campaign Finance Reform: Hillary would work to overturn Citizens United. Enough said.
- Climate Change: Hillary wants to make the United States a leader in the energy revolution, creating millions of new jobs while also working to preserve our planet.
- College Costs: As a college instructor, I am not a fan of Bernie Sanders’s free college, for many reasons. I support Hillary’s plan to control college costs and manage student loan debt so that any student who wants a college education can work for one.
- Criminal Justice Reform: This is probably the single most important issue to me, and Hillary’s very first speech addressed the hard facts of race and justice inequality. I wish she were better on mental health issues, but I think she’ll come around to that piece of the mass incarceration problem as well.
- Economy: Hillary has a smart plan for growth that includes addressing our nation’s critical infrastructure needs. I also support her tax relief for families plan, as well as her plans to address income inequality and corporate tax loopholes. Her husband presided over a period of economic prosperity, and I think that her centrist economic policies will be similar to his. As for the charge that she is in bed with the banks because she was paid speaker’s fees? Would we level the same charge at a man—i.e., negotiating a favorable contract and getting paid to do a job?
While Senator Sanders has some attractive ideas, there is
absolutely no evidence that he has any interest in compromise or consensus
building, nor has he given any realistic estimate of how he would pay for his
massive social programs (“Tax the rich” really isn’t a comprehensive economic
policy). And he is from Vermont, a state about as lacking in diversity as my own state
of Idaho.
If Hillary Clinton were a man, she would be the most popular
candidate in the race. But it’s been shown time and time again that the
qualities we admire in men—strength, decisiveness, intelligence—are the qualities
we detest in women.
Even other women don’t like her. Women my mother’s age generally
give two reasons for their dislike of Hillary: 1) She’s a liar; and 2) She
stood by her man when he had an affair.
The first criticism is demonstrably untrue. Though all
politicians have truth-bending skills, Hillary Clinton has been the most honestperson in this race, even compared to Sanders (72% of Clinton’s 125 evaluated
statements have been evaluated as half true or better; 70% of Sanders’s 52
evaluated statements were half true or better; 77% of Donald Trump’s statements
were mostly false or worse). When I pointed this fact out to a woman who told me Hillary was a liar, the woman replied, “Well, I just feel like she is a liar, even if she isn’t. You can’t
trust her.”
Why? Because she is a woman.
The second criticism—really??? Really??? I’m not going to
touch that one.
 |
| At least my son understands! |
Younger women’s reasons for supporting Bernie Sanders are
even more confusing to me. They seem to think that we’re in some kind of post-feminism
utopia where a political candidate’s gender doesn’t matter. These same young
women will wear, without a hint of irony, a t-shirt that reads “A Woman’s Place
is in the House…and the Senate.”
(Meanwhile, women are 19% of House of Representatives, 12% of
governors, 20% of Senators, 5% of Fortune 500 CEOs—and 0% of U.S. Presidents.)
Then there are women of a certain age—my age—who have grown
up with Hillary Clinton, and who have experienced, on much smaller but equally
painful scales, the rampant institutionalized misogyny that is currently threatening to deprive this country of its most qualified
presidential candidate.
I am one of those angry white women. It makes me uncomfortable to write this, because I was raised to believe that anger was not an acceptable emotion for women. I was taught to believe that nice girls finish first.
But I know I'm not alone. You don’t hear too much
about angry women like me, mostly because, as you might expect in a country rife with institutionalized
misogyny, all the focus is on the angry white men who support that
pseudo-candidate with the fake hair and small hands.
When you do hear about us, it’s because someone like former
Secretary of State Madeline Albright points out the obvious: this country needs
a woman president. Then Hillary Clinton has to apologize for being the most
qualified, experienced, and smart person in the race—because of her gender.
(Meanwhile, Trump doesn’t have to apologize for anything,
but that’s another story).
I’m an angry white woman, because, like Hillary, I’ve been
the most qualified person for a job—and lost it to a man. I’ve found out I’m
being paid 25% less for doing the same job as a man. I’ve joyfully announced a
pregnancy at work, only to be told by my boss, “I guess we can’t count on you
for anything.”
Like Hillary, I’m a smart, capable woman, and like Hillary, I’ve
paid dearly, both personally and professionally, for having qualities that are
considered “leadership traits” in men. When a woman has those same qualities,
people use another, less polite word. One that is also applied to female dogs.
“But wait!” several of my white male friends have told me. “I’m
a feminist. I don’t support institutionalized misogyny. Bernie Sanders’s
policies are better for women. And anyway, I don’t really see this misogyny you’re
talking about.”
Of course you don’t. You are not a woman. And while most Bernie
Sanders’s supporters are polite and reasonable, there is a small but vocal
minority of white men, sometimes called the BernieBros, who rival Trump
supporters in their vicious attacks on people who disagree with them. Like all
women expressing support for Hillary on Twitter, I’ve personally experienced the
BernieBros’ brand of “Feel the Bern.”
You know what’s better for women that Bernie Sanders’s
progressive policies? A woman president.
Hillary Clinton has survived years of vicious gossip and
Washington vitriol, all the while working hard to serve Americans. Has she made
mistakes? Of course she has. But she has been accountable about them, unlike
many men I can think of, her husband included.
Hillary Clinton is a wife, a mother, and a grandmother. She
is still the person I want to be when I grow up—but more importantly, I want my
children to see that a woman not only can grow up to be president, she can be
an awesome president.
Hillary Clinton speaks to my head—and to my heart. I’m
hoping this time, she’ll get her well deserved chance to make history.
Signed,
An Angry White Woman
